FOR VIVA-latest & completed - PDF to Presentation
Published on Sep 01, 2026
Description:
PREDICTING ELEMENTARY ESL TEACHERS’
BEHAVIOURAL INTENTION TO USE TECHNOLOGY
IN NATIONAL PRIMARY SCHOOLS IN KUALA
TERENGGANU DISTRICT: A UTAUT-BASED
QUANTITATIVE STUDY
NUR AMANINA BINTI MOHD NOOR
(SL4221)
MASTER OF ENGLISH LANGUAGE STUDIES
UNIVERSITI SULTAN ZAINAL ABIDIN
2026i
MERAMALKAN NIAT TINGKAH LAKU GURU ESL SEKOLAH RENDAH UNTUK
MENGGUNAKAN TEKNOLOGI DI SEKOLAH KEBANGSAAN DALAM DAERAH
KUALA TERENGGANU: KAJIAN KUANTITATIF BERASASKAN UTAUT
ABSTRAK
Pengenalan: Integrasi Teknologi Maklumat dan Komunikasi (TMK) dalam pengajaran
Bahasa Inggeris sebagai bahasa kedua (English as a Second Language, ESL) merupakan
keutamaan pendidikan negara di Malaysia, namun penggunaannya di bilik darjah masih tidak
sekata dan bukti pada peringkat daerah berkaitan guru ESL sekolah rendah masih terhad.
Berpandukan Teori Bersepadu Penerimaan dan Penggunaan Teknologi (Unified Theory of
Acceptance and Use of Technology, UTAUT), kajian ini meneliti tahap persepsi jangkaan
prestasi, jangkaan usaha, pengaruh sosial, keadaan pemudah cara, dan niat tingkah laku;
hubungan antara empat konstruk peramal dengan niat tingkah laku; serta sejauh mana konstruk
tersebut meramalkan niat guru di sekolah kebangsaan dalam daerah Kuala Terengganu.
Metodologi: Kajian ini menggunakan reka bentuk kuantitatif deskriptif korelasi dan tinjauan
keratan rentas. Daripada populasi sasaran seramai 280 orang guru di 51 buah sekolah, sebanyak
162 respons sah diperoleh melalui persampelan bertujuan. Soal selidik berstruktur
mengandungi 52 item, dan 28 item berskala Likert yang mengukur lima konstruk kajian
dimasukkan dalam analisis. Data dianalisis menggunakan IBM SPSS Statistics Versi 29
melalui statistik deskriptif, korelasi hasil darab momen Pearson, dan regresi linear berganda.
Dapatan: Min bagi kelima-lima konstruk melebihi titik tengah skala. Pengaruh sosial
mencatatkan min deskriptif tertinggi (M = 3.69), diikuti oleh jangkaan prestasi (M = 3.67), niat
tingkah laku (M = 3.60), jangkaan usaha (M = 3.31), dan keadaan pemudah cara (M = 3.30).
Keempat-empat konstruk peramal mempunyai hubungan positif dan signifikan dengan niat
tingkah laku, iaitu pengaruh sosial (r = .547), jangkaan prestasi (r = .528), jangkaan usaha (r =
.515), dan keadaan pemudah cara (r = .340), dengan semua nilai p < .001. Model regresi adalah
signifikan, F(4, 157) = 30.980, p < .001, dan menerangkan 44.1% varians niat tingkah laku (R²
= .441; R² terlaras = .427). Jangkaan usaha (β = .302), pengaruh sosial (β = .298), dan jangkaan
prestasi (β = .256) merupakan peramal positif yang signifikan, manakala keadaan pemudah
cara tidak memberikan sumbangan unik yang signifikan (β = -.037, p = .619). Dapatan ini
menegaskan keperluan untuk membezakan hubungan bivariat daripada sumbangan peramalan
unik. Kesimpulan: Kajian merumuskan bahawa UTAUT memberikan penjelasan yang
berguna tetapi tidak menyeluruh tentang niat tingkah laku dalam konteks ini. Niat guru paling
konsisten dikaitkan dengan usaha yang dapat diurus, persekitaran sosial sekolah yang
menyokong, dan jangkaan manfaat pengajaran. Dapatan menyokong penetapan jangkaan
kepimpinan yang jelas, bantuan rakan sekerja, pembangunan profesional berfokuskan
pedagogi, serta perhatian berterusan terhadap infrastruktur dan sokongan teknikal. Oleh sebab
data persampelan bertujuan yang dilaporkan sendiri dan berbentuk keratan rentas diperoleh
daripada satu daerah, serta penggunaan teknologi sebenar tidak diukur, dapatan kajian tidak
bersifat sebab-akibat dan tidak boleh digeneralisasikan kepada seluruh negara.ii
PREDICTING ELEMENTARY ESL TEACHERS’ BEHAVIOURAL INTENTION TO
USE TECHNOLOGY IN NATIONAL PRIMARY SCHOOLS IN KUALA
TERENGGANU DISTRICT: A UTAUT-BASED QUANTITATIVE STUDY
ABSTRACT
Introduction: The integration of Information and Communication Technology (ICT) into
English as a Second Language (ESL) instruction is a national priority in Malaysia, yet
classroom adoption remains uneven and district-level evidence concerning primary ESL
teachers is limited. Guided by the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology
(UTAUT), this study examined the perceived levels of performance expectancy, effort
expectancy, social influence, facilitating conditions, and behavioural intention; the
relationships between the four predictor constructs and behavioural intention; and the extent to
which these constructs predicted intention among teachers in national primary schools in Kuala
Terengganu district. Methodology: A quantitative descriptive correlational design and a crosssectional survey were used. From a target population of 280 teachers across 51 schools, 162
valid responses were obtained through purposive sampling. The structured questionnaire
contained 52 items, of which 28 Likert-scale items measuring the five study constructs were
included in the analyses. Data were analysed using IBM SPSS Statistics Version 29 through
descriptive statistics, Pearson product–moment correlation, and multiple linear regression.
Results: All five construct means were above the scale midpoint. Social influence recorded the
highest descriptive mean (M = 3.69), followed by performance expectancy (M = 3.67),
behavioural intention (M = 3.60), effort expectancy (M = 3.31), and facilitating conditions (M
= 3.30). All four predictor constructs were significantly and positively correlated with
behavioural intention: social influence (r = .547), performance expectancy (r = .528), effort
expectancy (r = .515), and facilitating conditions (r = .340), all p < .001. The regression model
was significant, F(4, 157) = 30.980, p < .001, and explained 44.1% of the variance in
behavioural intention (R² = .441; adjusted R² = .427). Effort expectancy (β = .302), social
influence (β = .298), and performance expectancy (β = .256) were significant positive
predictors, whereas facilitating conditions did not make a significant unique contribution (β =
−.037, p = .619). These findings demonstrate the need to distinguish bivariate relationships
from unique predictive contributions. Conclusion: The study concludes that UTAUT provides
a useful but incomplete explanation of behavioural intention in this context. Teachers’
intentions were most consistently associated with manageable effort, a supportive school social
environment, and anticipated instructional benefits. The findings support clear leadership
expectations, collegial assistance, pedagogically focused professional development, and
continued attention to infrastructure and technical support. Because the purposive, crosssectional, self-reported data came from one district and actual technology use was not
measured, the findings are non-causal and not nationally generalisable.iii
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
First and foremost, all praise and gratitude are due to Allah SWT, the Almighty, for His
blessings, guidance, strength, and perseverance throughout this academic journey. It is by His
grace that I have been able to complete this thesis. I would like to express my deepest and most
sincere gratitude to my supervisor, Dr. Nurshafawati binti Ahmad Sani, for her continuous
support, patience, encouragement, thoughtful guidance, constructive feedback, and invaluable
knowledge throughout this study. Her careful supervision and insightful suggestions have
contributed greatly to the development and completion of this thesis. I am truly grateful to have
had her as my supervisor and mentor.
I gratefully acknowledge the Ministry of Education Malaysia (MOE) for awarding me the
Hadiah Latihan Persekutuan (HLP), which provided me with the valuable opportunity and
support to pursue my master’s degree. My appreciation also extends to the academic and
administrative staff of Universiti Sultan Zainal Abidin (UniSZA), the relevant educational
authorities, and the school administrators who facilitated the conduct of this research.
My sincere thanks go to all the ESL teachers from national primary schools in Kuala
Terengganu district who willingly participated in this study. Their time, cooperation, and
valuable responses made this research possible.
I am also deeply thankful to my colleagues and friends for their encouragement, assistance,
and moral support throughout this journey. Finally, my heartfelt appreciation goes to my
beloved husband, children, parents, and family members for their endless prayers, patience,
understanding, sacrifices, and unwavering support. Their love and encouragement gave me the
strength to persevere and complete this thesis.iv
APPROVAL
I certify that an Examination Committee has met on (viva date) to conduct the final examination
of (candidate’s name), on his / her thesis entitled ‘Title of Thesis’ in accordance with the
regulations approved by the Senate of Universiti Sultan Zainal Abidin. The Committee
recommends that the candidate be awarded the relevant degree, and it has been accepted by the
Senate of Universiti Sultan Zainal Abidin as fulfilment of the requirements for the (insert the
name of the degree). The members of the Examination Committee are as follows:
Professor
Name of Faculty
Universiti Sultan Zainal Abidin
(Chairperson)
Associate Professor
Name of Faculty
Universiti Sultan Zainal Abidin
(Internal Examiner)
Name of External Examiner, PhD
Title (e.g., Professor / Associate Professor / Ir.; omit if irrelevant)
Name of Faculty
Name of University
(External Examiner)
Associate Professor Is.
Dean of Graduate School
Universiti Sultan Zainal Abidin
Date:v
DECLARATION BY CANDIDATE
I hereby declare that the thesis is based on my original work except for quotations and citations,
which have been duly acknowledged. I also declare that it has not been previously or
concurrently submitted for any other degree at Universiti Sultan Zainal Abidin or other
institutions.
Name of Candidate: (Candidate name)
Date : (XX/XX/2023)vi
DECLARATION BY Choose an item.
This is to confirm that:
The research conducted and the writing of this Choose an item. was under Choose an item.
supervision.
Signature :
Name of Main Supervisor :
Faculty :vii
TABLE OF CONTENT
Page
ABSTRAK i
ABSTRACT ii
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT iii
APPROVAL iv
DECLARATION BY CANDIDATE v
DECLARATION BY vi
TABLE OF CONTENTS vii
LIST OF TABLES xi
LIST OF FIGURES xii
LIST OF APPENDICES xiv
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS xv
LIST OF SYMBOLS xvii
CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION 1
1.1 Introduction 1
1.2 Background of the Study 1
1.3 Statement of the Problem 7
1.4 Purpose of the Study 10
1.5 Research Objectives 10
1.6 Research Questions 11
1.7 Research Hypothesis 12
1.8 Limitations of the Study 12
1.9 Significance of the Study 14
1.10 Operational Definitions 16
1.11 Chapter Summary 19viii
CHAPTER 2 LITERATURE REVIEW 19
2.1 Introduction 19
2.2 ICT Integration in Educational Settings 20
2.3 Technology Integration in ESL Elementary Classrooms 22
2.4 Barriers and Challenges Associated with Teacher Technology Use 25
2.5 The Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) 27
2.5.1 UTAUT’S Alignment to this Study 28
2.5.2 Constructs of the UTAUT 30
2.5.3 Justification for Using UTAUT in the Current Study 32
2.6 Theoretical Framework 33
2.7 Conceptual Framework 35
2.8 Empirical Studies of Teachers’ Technology Acceptance Based on 37
UTAUT
2.9 Chapter Summary 41
CHAPTER 3 METHODOLOGY 42
3.1 Introduction 42
3.2 Research Approach 43
3.3 Research Design 44
3.4 Population 45
3.5 Sample Size and Sampling Method 46
3.6 Selection Criteria 48
3.7 Research Instrument 49
3.8 Pilot Study 52
3.8.1 Content Validity 53ix
3.8.2 Reliability 54
3.9 Research Procedures 56
3.10 Data Collection Procedures 58
3.11 Data Analysis Procedures 61
3.12 Chapter Summary 64
CHAPTER 4 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION 65
4.1 Introduction 65
4.2 Respondents’ Demographic and Technology- Use Profiles 66
4.3 Perceived Levels of the UTAUT Constructs and Behavioural Intention 79
4.3.1 Effort Expectancy 79
4.3.2 Performance Expectancy 84
4.3.3 Social Influence 88
4.3.4 Facilitating Conditions 92
4.3.5 Behavioural intention 96
4.3.6 Summary 100
4.4 The Relationship Between UTAUT Predictor Constructs and 101
Elementary ESL Teachers’ Behavioural Intention to Use Technology
in National Primary Schools in Kuala Terengganu District
4.5 Predictors of Elementary ESL Teachers’ Behavioural Intention to Use 105
Technology
4.6 Conclusion 111
CHAPTER 5 CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS 112
5.1 Introduction 112